There are ways to go from this art directly to 3D models and I’m sure tons of people will post links to them. But I want to point out quality and artistic know

There are ways to go from this art directly to 3D models and I’m sure tons of people will post links to them. But I want to point out quality and artistic knowledge. The poster is clearly a talented artist. They knew how to direct the images to what they wanted and likely rejected many iterations before they got to this point. They knew how to then take that image and translate it to 3D , and make it come together. They knew how to make a topology flow that makes sense for their prototype etc… I think a lot of people see “good output” and forget about the process and knowledge+experience required to make something good. I take photography as an example. Every one with the means likely has a camera today. It still takes a brilliant eye to take an amazing photo. You could take two brilliant photographers and someone without expertise to a gorgeous location. The two experienced photographers will have a higher likelihood to come out with amazing but very different images. The layperson could maybe take a good photo but the chances are much lower because they likely don’t have the experience to think about composition or story telling. I liken these advancements in AI to that. Yeah, some people will put out pretty images, but there’s so much more that goes into making something great out of it that people underestimate