4 ms·

I'll be curious to see if text-to-3d is better than text-to-2d with some other 2d-to-3d process. I guess text-to-3d offers the potential of automatically creat

I'll be curious to see if text-to-3d is better than text-to-2d with some other 2d-to-3d process. I guess text-to-3d offers the potential of automatically creating entire worlds with very little human/artist intervention. But text-to-2d matches current processes with more chances for an artist to intervene, and also has more training material for art styles.

CuriouslyC 4y ago
It'll probably start with 2d -> 3d because a lot of work has already been put into tools to automatically take images and convert them to 3d. Ultimately direct to 3d will work better, but we will probably need more 3d data for it to reach it's potential, so 2d -> 3d might last for a while. In the interim, people will do all sorts of hacks on top of 2d -> 3d to reduce the amount of required human intervention.