3 ms·
Sure, but if anything that shows that newspaper companies can't be trusted to report accurate numbers if there is no oversight whatsoever. All I'm saying is th
by contravariant 4y ago
Sure, but if anything that shows that newspaper companies can't be trusted to report accurate numbers if there is no oversight whatsoever.
All I'm saying is that the same logic holds for websites and that tracking people is a needlessly paranoid and harmful solution to the problem when it can be solved with trust, contracts and auditing.
- ghaff 4y ago>it can be solved with trust, contracts and auditing I actually agree with you. And large businesses in particular are both audited and do internal audits all the time. It's not that they and their employees are all untrustworthy but audits can both catch mistakes and send a signal that people are watching. There are probably other mechanisms to do fraud detection. But, as your comment suggests, they may be more heavyweight and therefore might exclude most smaller sites.
- jefftk 4y agoI don't see how audits work well in this situation. I wrote more about what ad fraud can look like in this comment [1] and I don't see how an audit would catch "as a publisher, one of our traffic sources is sending us bots instead of real visitors". [1] https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dFgfQTo4DRZG5t8Ap/can-ads-be-gdpr-compliant?commentId=A6nPi3HD9Qj4GvyA7 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dFgfQTo4DRZG5t8Ap/can-ads-be...