From the excerpt it looks like they want to make the classic "computers-can't be creative" argument (although I haven't read the article). There, one school mak

From the excerpt it looks like they want to make the classic "computers-can't be creative" argument (although I haven't read the article). There, one school makes the argument that only humans can make truly creative discoveries, like Einstein. But without even discussing the merits of this argument, that distinction is really not yet important. Presently, most of the people interested in AGI, are concerned with building the general intelligence in the first place. The kind of intelligence present in the average human and not the one from Einstein. Very few people are trying to tackle the artificial-Einstein problem before the AGI one.