4 ms·
> The rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy centers around the concept of rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD), proposed in a 2018 study to be a subtype of ge
by hashmap 4y ago
> The rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy centers around the concept of rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD), proposed in a 2018 study to be a subtype of gender dysphoria caused by peer influence and social contagion.[1] It has not been recognized by any major professional association as a valid mental health diagnosis, and use of the term has been discouraged by the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, and other medical organizations due to a lack of reputable scientific evidence, major methodological issues in existing research, and likelihood to cause harm by stigmatizing gender-affirming care.[2][3][4][5]
This isn't science.
> Lisa Littman, at the time an adjunct assistant professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, created the term based on an online survey of parents on three anti-trans websites who believed that their teenage children had suddenly manifested symptoms of gender dysphoria and begun identifying as transgender simultaneously with other children in their peer group.[6][7][8] Littman speculated that rapid onset of gender dysphoria could be a "social coping mechanism" for other disorders.[1]
Spreading this garbage is grotesque and bigoted. Stop it.
- bunchil 4y agoIt is science. If you read Littman's research, this would be apparent. Just because some research challenges your ideological viewpoint, doesn't mean it's bigoted.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- asherah 4y agoyou can't act like surveying people who are ideologically against the concept of trans people can make for an unbiased basis on which to claim things about trans people
- antifa 4y agoNo we think you're bigoted because of how fast you're sprinting with this tiny molehill you're calling "research".