3 ms·
I inferred no ideaoligic reasoning in my post. I only referenced financials I hadn't thought were public (which I've since learned were). Perhaps ideology is be
by andrew_ 4y ago
I inferred no ideaoligic reasoning in my post. I only referenced financials I hadn't thought were public (which I've since learned were). Perhaps ideology is being injected?
- pxmpxm 4y agoPeople reading what you wrote are faced with uncomfortable introspection regarding the underlying ideology: "Twitter now allows stuff i disagree with, so them being in financial trouble is good, because stuff i disagree is bad". Where as your post forces them to think through how is it that twitter is in financial trouble all the sudden, but not before, and whether that is an accurate representation of reality versus a narrative to appeal to the aforementioned bias. People go out of their way to avoid cognitive dissonance, so downvote.
- acdha 4y agoWith all due respect, that reads more like projection than serious analysis. Twitter had concerns about its financial prospects going back to before its IPO and major shakeups were predicted for years. When the 2016 elections lead to a big uptick in usage, the coverage was often along the lines that Trump saved the company by giving so many people something to talk about.