3 ms·
Firstly, don't take listicles too seriously. But more importantly, how is the ability to hold a note before needing to breathe a useful and objective measure h
by PaulRobinson 4y ago
Firstly, don't take listicles too seriously.
But more importantly, how is the ability to hold a note before needing to breathe a useful and objective measure how "most influential" a philosopher is?
- thaumasiotes 4y agoIt's like you didn't even read my comment. The ability to hold a note is just as useful a measure of how influential a philosopher is as citations in academic journals is. That's what I just said, right above you.
- PaulRobinson 4y agoSo you think published output and reference to that output is not as equally a valid objective measure of influence in an academic setting as singing well? OK, we're so far apart on this I'll just wish you godspeed on your rather perverse intellectual journey!
- hnfong 4y agoIt proves that the alleged philosopher is quite alive. Not sure how academic citations proves that (quite the contrary).