> a significant percentage of YouTube content [...] a world model far richer and more robust than ChatGPT’s There are three objections to this. The first is t

> a significant percentage of YouTube content [...] a world model far richer and more robust than ChatGPT’s There are three objections to this. The first is the astonishingly large amount of CPU power that this would take, given how high bandwidth video is. The second is that it is hard to believe that some thing really coherent could emerge from this, and certainly, it has never been shown. The third is that the world might be "richer" in terms of information-rich but seeing the world through YouTube's eyes would likely be a degrading and incoherent experience.