4 ms·
Honestly, I don't blame you. A genuine news release from a .gov site was not on the first couple pages of search results. However, that is by design. https://
by upsidesinclude 4y ago
Honestly, I don't blame you. A genuine news release from a .gov site was not on the first couple pages of search results. However, that is by design.
https://gov.alaska.gov/supreme-court-decision-forces-biden-administration-to-withdraw-broad-employer-vaccine-mandate-states-warn-against-seeking-narrower-rule/ https://gov.alaska.gov/supreme-court-decision-forces-biden-a...
- Someone1234 4y agoThat political press release doesn't support your earlier point that it was proven "unconstitutional." In fact review of the SCOTUS opinion shows that they (6-3) found that OSHA exceeded their congressional authority, not violated the US Constitution. > “Although Congress has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly,” the court wrote If you want to show how this was unconstitutional then you'll need to show something else entirely. This SCOTUS opinion isn't proof of that, no matter if it is from a ".gov" site or not.
- upsidesinclude 4y agoIt does dawn on you that this is expressly written in a manner which entices the idea such congressional authority exists. And yet does not mean that the authority exists. One cannot grant what it does not have.