> In and of itself I don't think there's anything wrong with trying to reduce urban use just because it's not the chief contributor. This is incorrect. It’s ha

> In and of itself I don't think there's anything wrong with trying to reduce urban use just because it's not the chief contributor. This is incorrect. It’s harmful because people have limited cycles to think about these things and having them focused on their own use is a great way to prevent the actual issue from getting fixed. A bunch of government rules on personal use gives the wrong impression that personal use is even relevant.