4 ms·
I think this dovetails nicely with Graeber's "Bullshit Jobs" [0] thesis. From the Wikipedia entry, it looks like 37% of Britons polled thought their jobs were "
by abetusk 4y ago
I think this dovetails nicely with Graeber's "Bullshit Jobs" [0] thesis. From the Wikipedia entry, it looks like 37% of Britons polled thought their jobs were "bullshit", with the HVB article talking about an excess management of around 17%.
I wonder how much overhead is "natural/health" and whether the amount of "bullshit" jobs is related to a "full employment" mentality, maybe even subsidized by the government.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit_Jobs
- myshpa 4y ago> 37% of Britons polled thought their jobs were "bullshit" I've seen numbers as high as 70%+. Not everybody is ready to acknowledge that his/her work is meaningless. If that's true, nothing would change if 3/4 of the workforce stopped working tomorrow. And iff that's true (and I strongly suspect it is), than the basic income is the only logical outcome (imho).
- astrange 4y agoPolling doesn't necessarily find you the truth here. It's like when you poll business owners in California and they say it's a bad environment for business, by which they mean they want lower taxes, not that somewhere else would actually get them more customers.