6 ms·

Okay but not really though right? https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/ https://www.aap.com.au/factchec

Okay but not really though right? https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/ https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say...

Izkata 4y ago
Yes really, to quote my link: > PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure. They showed it actually happening in extracted human liver cells in a lab, not in a live human. That would be the next step. But in the meantime the "genomic DNA" part does sound like it made a permanent change to those cells.
- grey-area 4y ago
  The researchers say you’re wrong. Read the article linked, and question why you’re being fed conspiracy theories.
  - Izkata 4y ago
    The fact check does not address the sentence I quoted, where they tested the "genomic DNA" and found a match to the mRNA vaccine.
    - skiman10 4y ago
      Two authors of the Lund University study, Associate Professor Yang de Marinis and Professor Magnus Rasmussen, have also released a Q&A in response to the attention their work has generated on social media. “The results have in many cases been misinterpreted,” they said. “This study does not investigate whether the Pfizer vaccine alters our genome,” de Marinis confirmed. Prof Rasmussen also stated: “There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.” The study was conducted in a laboratory on cells in a petri dish, which is not the same as a study on human subjects because “cell lines differ from cells in living organisms,” Rasmussen wrote. Dr Parry also said the Huh7 cell line is very different from healthy human cells. “Huh-7 is an immortal, tumorigenic cell line,” he said. “This is barely an appropriate system to make any claims of in healthy persons.” https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/ https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say...
      - Izkata 4y ago
        Now allow me to repeat myself: > They showed it actually happening in extracted human liver cells in a lab, not in a live human. That would be the next step. Stop assuming things I'm not saying.
        grey-area 4y ago
        This bit was wrong: They showed it actually happening in extracted human liver cells…it made a permanent change to those cells.
        Izkata 4y ago
        To repeat myself again: > The fact check does not address the sentence I quoted, where they tested the "genomic DNA" and found a match to the mRNA vaccine.

Okay but not really though right? https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/ https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say...

Izkata 4y ago

Yes really, to quote my link: > PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure. They showed it actually happening in extracted human liver cells in a lab, not in a live human. That would be the next step. But in the meantime the "genomic DNA" part does sound like it made a permanent change to those cells.

grey-area 4y ago
The researchers say you’re wrong. Read the article linked, and question why you’re being fed conspiracy theories.
- Izkata 4y ago
  The fact check does not address the sentence I quoted, where they tested the "genomic DNA" and found a match to the mRNA vaccine.
  - skiman10 4y ago
    Two authors of the Lund University study, Associate Professor Yang de Marinis and Professor Magnus Rasmussen, have also released a Q&A in response to the attention their work has generated on social media. “The results have in many cases been misinterpreted,” they said. “This study does not investigate whether the Pfizer vaccine alters our genome,” de Marinis confirmed. Prof Rasmussen also stated: “There is no reason for anyone to change their decision to take the vaccine based on this study.” The study was conducted in a laboratory on cells in a petri dish, which is not the same as a study on human subjects because “cell lines differ from cells in living organisms,” Rasmussen wrote. Dr Parry also said the Huh7 cell line is very different from healthy human cells. “Huh-7 is an immortal, tumorigenic cell line,” he said. “This is barely an appropriate system to make any claims of in healthy persons.” https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say-covid-vaccine-changes-human-dna/ https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/a-swedish-study-did-not-say...
    - Izkata 4y ago
      Now allow me to repeat myself: > They showed it actually happening in extracted human liver cells in a lab, not in a live human. That would be the next step. Stop assuming things I'm not saying.
      - grey-area 4y ago
        This bit was wrong: They showed it actually happening in extracted human liver cells…it made a permanent change to those cells.
        Izkata 4y ago
        To repeat myself again: > The fact check does not address the sentence I quoted, where they tested the "genomic DNA" and found a match to the mRNA vaccine.