3 ms·
I think you are confused about what "standing" means, it is the "legal capicity to sue". It generally means being directly harmed in a manner that the court can
by shkkmo 4y ago
I think you are confused about what "standing" means, it is the "legal capicity to sue". It generally means being directly harmed in a manner that the court can redress with a favorable decision.
So it is quite possible that the court will say SPS has standing but decide against them because of the vagueness of the public nuisance law.
- EarlKing 4y agoNo, I'm quite clear about what standing means, thank you. They're predicating their standing on this being a violation of a nuisance statute. I didn't say they don't have standing under that statute, just that the statute is unconstitutionally vague.
- ClumsyPilot 4y ago> just that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. Half of your constitution is unconstitutionally vague