First, so you don't believe it's possible to plant DNA? That it could never EVER happen? Gawd you're naive, and also seemingly unaware that DNA isn't necessaril

First, so you don't believe it's possible to plant DNA? That it could never EVER happen? Gawd you're naive, and also seemingly unaware that DNA isn't necessarily proof-positive. Second, references please. We'd be especially interested in ones where two people were in the same bed and both went out in silence. Nonetheless, that doesn't help with incrimination here. That doesn't make him any more guilty, does it? (Hint: Nope). Third, you're completely discounting what his PhD work was in. Imagine doing PhD level study and making ALL the classic bone-head mistakes. How does that make sense to anyone reasonable? Fourth, I'm not leaving out anything. I'm saying - and to your point (thanks for mentioning the plates) - everything presented "as is" is circumstantial. I never mentioned a mastermind. Only that, car stealing...easy. Phone stealing...easy. DNA...super easy. Changing plates...hardly proof of guilt. Where you and "the facts" are failing is simple: - No eye-witness - Car and phone !== person. Nuff said. - No motive The reality is, based on facts - as they are today - my theory is just as good if not better than yours. So yeah, there's that. You can calm down now. It's ok. It's simply a "what if" discussion that's obviously beyond your small-minded capabilities. p.s. Also, references to Occam's Razor as a legal tool in a court of law would be a big help.