3 ms·
In my limited experience(and I haven't tried the expensive stuff like Kemper or Neural dsp), the difference is most apparent to the player in the way amp and ef
by jimnotgym 4y ago
In my limited experience(and I haven't tried the expensive stuff like Kemper or Neural dsp), the difference is most apparent to the player in the way amp and effects react to playing dynamics. For a blues player sat 'on the edge of overdrive' the effect of injecting emotion into ones playing comes through the amp in a way I couldn't get with a digital amp. This the affects the players response. I feel like a million dollars through my Fender Twin. I close my eyes and channel my Stevie Ray. It didn't happen to me through a Boss Katana. If you were paying to listen to me (as if), you would get better vfm from the tube amp.
If I played metal, or was backing a pop group, one pedal di'd to the desk sounds like the dream
- neoromantique 4y agoI ditched my amps for Neural DSP VST' and I play somewhat similar stuff. I recommend trying them out, especially "Tone King Imperial MKII" (there's a free trial available).
- jimnotgym 4y agoThat is really interesting. Can I ask a couple of things? What do you do for monitoring? What about amp induced sustain, do you lose that?
- neoromantique 4y ago>What do you do for monitoring? I don't play live so for me it isn't an issue, I just have set of monitor speakers to play on. >amp induced sustain As in Feedback? This too is applicable primarily for live setting, but I don't know how well it'd work as I haven't tried it.