3 ms·
They were terrible, because the resolution was low in the early models. And they were JPEG, so they were "fake" computational.
by hgsgm 4y ago
They were terrible, because the resolution was low in the early models.
And they were JPEG, so they were "fake" computational.
- okasaki 4y agoResolution isn't important in small sensors, and the JPEG processing can't be compared to what phones do. A 2007 P&S isn't going to turn a grey overcast sky blue because it thinks skies should be blue like an iphone does.
- Normille 4y ago>They were terrible.... If these kids want to really push the envelope of crappy digital imagery, they should get themselves an early Apple QuickTake. Now that was a dire camera. A mighty 640x480 resolution and colour rendering that made poeple look like they were made of clay. I wonder whatever happened to the company that made them? Probably went bankrupt, soon after inflicting that monstrosity on an unsuspecting world.