3 ms·
Except that they don't suck? They were made by companies specializing in imaging, had decent sized sensors, glass lenses, and no fake computational/"AI" photog
by okasaki 4y ago
Except that they don't suck?
They were made by companies specializing in imaging, had decent sized sensors, glass lenses, and no fake computational/"AI" photography.
- hgsgm 4y agoThey were terrible, because the resolution was low in the early models. And they were JPEG, so they were "fake" computational.
- okasaki 4y agoResolution isn't important in small sensors, and the JPEG processing can't be compared to what phones do. A 2007 P&S isn't going to turn a grey overcast sky blue because it thinks skies should be blue like an iphone does.
- Normille 4y ago>They were terrible.... If these kids want to really push the envelope of crappy digital imagery, they should get themselves an early Apple QuickTake. Now that was a dire camera. A mighty 640x480 resolution and colour rendering that made poeple look like they were made of clay. I wonder whatever happened to the company that made them? Probably went bankrupt, soon after inflicting that monstrosity on an unsuspecting world.