4 ms·

The title is highly misleading for some theoretical "exploration".

• dang 4y ago
  Ok, we've put a question mark up there to make it more explorationy.
  • trishume 4y ago
    As the author, this sounds good to me! I'll probably even change the actual title to match. I originally was going to make it a question mark and the only reason I didn't is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline... when I think the answer is probably "could probably be somewhat done" rather than "no".
    • dang 4y ago
      Well this may be the first time that's ever happened :) Betteridge antiexamples are always welcome. I once tried to joke that Mr. Betteridge had "retired" and promptly got corrected about his employment status (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10393754 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10393754).