3 ms·

Well it's in the terms that you may not do any of that, but of course there are always bad actors out there. Wouldn't someone have that issue with a regular lo

Well it's in the terms that you may not do any of that, but of course there are always bad actors out there. Wouldn't someone have that issue with a regular logo as well? Wouldn't the same recourse be followed?

josephcsible 4y ago
> Wouldn't someone have that issue with a regular logo as well? Isn't the usual workflow "pay me and I'll make a logo for you", not "here's a bunch of premade logos for sale"?
- beechwood 4y ago
  Where is the usual workflow documented? I missed that memo.
  - klyrs 4y ago
    [flagged]
    - beechwood 4y ago
      I'd be curious to know which ones you "recognize"...I'm familiar with how my logos are produced, you aren't. Again with the assumptions.
rebuilder 4y ago
With a regular logo, the designer has copyright law to back them up. Pure AI creations so not seem to get that protection
- libria 4y ago
  This is a very new area where law has not caught up. Surely in any creative process (book author, painter) there is a process where the artist selects and omits elements before the final product. Is not the selection and omission of poorly generated images the "human authorship" [1] necessary to qualify? Or can OP modify AI generated art meaningfully to qualify for copyright? [1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-office-rules-ai-art-cant-be-copyrighted-180979808/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-offic...
  - charcircuit 4y ago
    Additionally the choice of the model is an important choice too. Some AI art collections even make their own derivative models where a human picks extra images to train off of. It reminds me of 3D art where there is a lot of up front work in making models, textures, armatures, and shaders. You send a ton of data to the GPU and it spits out a rendered image or more likely a tile of one. Sending a vector of bones does not seem much different then sending a vector of a prompt.
- sramam 4y ago
  Isn't the fact that these are curated make them not "pure AI"? A human in the loop applied "their" design aesthetic to the selection process.
  - beechwood 4y ago
    Didn't humans make AI?

josephcsible 4y ago

> Wouldn't someone have that issue with a regular logo as well? Isn't the usual workflow "pay me and I'll make a logo for you", not "here's a bunch of premade logos for sale"?

beechwood 4y ago
Where is the usual workflow documented? I missed that memo.
- klyrs 4y ago
  [flagged]
  - beechwood 4y ago
    I'd be curious to know which ones you "recognize"...I'm familiar with how my logos are produced, you aren't. Again with the assumptions.

rebuilder 4y ago

With a regular logo, the designer has copyright law to back them up. Pure AI creations so not seem to get that protection

libria 4y ago
This is a very new area where law has not caught up. Surely in any creative process (book author, painter) there is a process where the artist selects and omits elements before the final product. Is not the selection and omission of poorly generated images the "human authorship" [1] necessary to qualify? Or can OP modify AI generated art meaningfully to qualify for copyright? [1] https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-office-rules-ai-art-cant-be-copyrighted-180979808/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/us-copyright-offic...
- charcircuit 4y ago
  Additionally the choice of the model is an important choice too. Some AI art collections even make their own derivative models where a human picks extra images to train off of. It reminds me of 3D art where there is a lot of up front work in making models, textures, armatures, and shaders. You send a ton of data to the GPU and it spits out a rendered image or more likely a tile of one. Sending a vector of bones does not seem much different then sending a vector of a prompt.
sramam 4y ago
Isn't the fact that these are curated make them not "pure AI"? A human in the loop applied "their" design aesthetic to the selection process.
- beechwood 4y ago
  Didn't humans make AI?