3 ms·
> Questioning the established science is pro science provided it’s done in good faith and it looks like the parent is acting in good faith. I see the opposite
by di456 4y ago
> Questioning the established science is pro science provided it’s done in good faith and it looks like the parent is acting in good faith.
I see the opposite here, it's another take of outrage porn based on misinformation.
Good science would be having a hypothesis and doing scientific research on it. Science is based on hypothesis. It rarely gets to 100% but does work off of statistical significance. Whereas conspiracy theory regurgitation is based on opinion and story telling and does little to nothing to move science forward.
- goldenchrome 4y agoAsking questions is the start of the scientific process. If it turns out that vaccines cause undisclosed health problems then wouldn’t you be outraged too? Let’s see how it unfolds. Most of us can’t do the science ourselves, but we can ask questions and observe.