2 ms·
>"where the world should intervene" The world never intervenes. The US and some other countries / blocks do. Until there is assured punishment for "wrong" int
by FpUser 4y ago
>"where the world should intervene"
The world never intervenes. The US and some other countries / blocks do.
Until there is assured punishment for "wrong" interference your argument is empty. The only countries that get punished happen to be weak ones. And you probably aware about what the US thinks about ICC.
- phpisthebest 4y agoCaptain of "no one should interfere with the inter workings of an nation" is now talking about having a World Government, ICC, and punishment for wrong interference Make up your mind please? Or is your view just a standard anti-US position.
- FpUser 4y ago>"Captain ..." Did I hurt your feelings sailor? I see no contradiction in my statements if you bother to actually read. I said "Until there is assured punishment". We know this is not happening. I do not see it as advocating world government. It simple means if one does not suffer the consequences of their action the one would simply degenerate into doing what they feel like. Also I am not "standard anti US". The US is my neighbor (I am in Canada), I've visited it many times and admire many things. However their governments do commit major crimes and I am absolutely not fond of this part.