3 ms·
I like a lot of what you said, but: It’s you versus the tens or hundreds of other qualified people who applied for the job. If you’re not the best
by JohnBooty 4y ago
I like a lot of what you said, but:
It’s you versus the tens or hundreds of other qualified
people who applied for the job. If you’re not the best
of those applicants, you’re not getting an offer.
This doesn't even stand up to a quick reality check. If only "the best" out of "tens or hundreds of other qualified people" ever got hired, we'd be seeing 90%+ unemployment rates for engineers and clearly that isn't the case. The reality is clearly nearer the opposite!
Seems you've got a few incorrect assumptions there.
1. You're assuming that the people doing the hiring actually can identify "the best."
2. You're assuming there actually is one "best" candidate.
3. You're assuming that the person they decided was "best" actually accepts their offer.
The reality is that demand still outstrips supply, so most engineers do find work, but it's a highly imprecise process where nobody really knows how an engineer is going to work out until they've spent six months in the job.
- JCharante 4y agoWell most people apply to a lot of jobs which is why there’s not a 90% unemployment rate
- denton-scratch 4y ago> You're assuming that the people doing the hiring actually can identify "the best." FSVO "best". The best coder? Designer? Team leader? Co-worker? The candidate the interviwer judged most trustworthy? The people doing the hiring could have any of a number of different criteria.