3 ms·

>"tries to enact a positive change than otherwise" Well there are whole bunch of countries ruined by your "enactment of a positive change" and millions of peop

• throwaway290 4y ago
  Again the earlier point which you did not disagree with is that it's inevitable, and so you can wait for China to do it in a less peaceful way > millions of people killed This is not what we are discussing and you know it. Millions of people killed in waging war and mass murder is exactly what happens eventually if you let bad guys prosper. Sorry, positive change has to be enacted whether you like it or not, there is simply no noninvolvement in a shared world so the only alternative is a kleptodictator enacts their version of change and it will be positive to a much smaller number of people. You can choose if you want to enact positive change by way of violence or not, but calling for not enacting it is worse than calling for war, you would be leaving uncountable people and potentially your own descendants in future to suffer
  • FpUser 4y ago
    >"Again the earlier point which you did not disagree with is that it's inevitable, and so you can wait for China to do it in a less peaceful way" China is busy harassing their own but it was not China that had invaded and fucked up scores of countries. >"This is not what we are discussing and you know it." Yes it is. Cut the bullshit. The millions I was talking about are the result of the "enactment of positive change" you are so fond of. Anyways I very much dislike your line of thinking an would prefer not to continue this lovely conversation.
    • throwaway290 4y ago
      Please go ahead live in your world, I'm immensely thankful your opinion is of no consequence.