5 ms·

Cinnamon is waaay more configurable than GNOME and they have far less dev resources, and they are fairly bug-free. KDE is still kind of janky but has improved v

Cinnamon is waaay more configurable than GNOME and they have far less dev resources, and they are fairly bug-free. KDE is still kind of janky but has improved very quickly and continues to improve due to more corporate funding over the last year or two. Tbh there's no excuse, especially when GNOME devs REMOVE features that are already there that have no maintenance cost for no reason (https://discourse.gnome.org/t/icon-view-sizes-in-nautilus-43/11240 https://discourse.gnome.org/t/icon-view-sizes-in-nautilus-43...).

QUrprUd1nCeicw 4y ago
Cinnamon is also way behind on the tech. They're still stuck on GTK3 and X11. The resources going to KDE to reduce jankiness is only going to KDE. It isn't going to GNOME. I can't see why you think that would have any effect on anything else. Did you bother to read that whole thread? The developer gives a long explanation with the reasons: https://discourse.gnome.org/t/icon-view-sizes-in-nautilus-43/11240/32 https://discourse.gnome.org/t/icon-view-sizes-in-nautilus-43...