4 ms·
Well, a substantial part of that is that it doesn't have all the information (for humans often experiences) that you have, so of course it can't come to a simil
by Tams80 4y ago
Well, a substantial part of that is that it doesn't have all the information (for humans often experiences) that you have, so of course it can't come to a similar conclusion.
- whaaswijk 4y agoI think a key difference with humans is that ChatGPT doesn’t know that it doesn’t know.
- grugagag 4y agoChatgpt doesn’t think even if it appears to do do
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ebjaas_2022 4y agoUsually it does have all the information, it just isn't able to put it all together. If you for instance ask it to name the female tennis players who have won the Wimbledon tennis tournament twice, but not more than twice, it will give you a plausible list of names, but at least half of the names on the list will be wrong. If you then ask it to tell you more about one of the players that has been wrongly named, it will actually be able to tell you the correct number of Wimbledon wins for that player. It does know the facts. It just doesn't know how to put the facts together into new useful knowledge.