> Because physical security boils down to capable men with guns, whether that's private security, the police, or godfather type arrangements. >> drones , remot

> Because physical security boils down to capable men with guns, whether that's private security, the police, or godfather type arrangements. >> drones , remote weapons, surveillance tech, “lingering weapons”, has shown that physical security absolutely does not boil down to “ capable men with guns”. How is that disproving the parents point? Capable men with drones is not meaningfully different to capable men with guns, or pointy sticks for that matter.