5 ms·
> However, the list of URN namespaces is very lacking Because ontology is fucking garbage. All ontology fails, it always has. Why are we still discussing thi
by aaron695 4y ago
> However, the list of URN namespaces is very lacking
Because ontology is fucking garbage.
All ontology fails, it always has.
Why are we still discussing this?
> Why are URNs not more popular?
Wiki - "URNs are globally unique persistent identifiers assigned within defined namespaces so they will be available for a long period of time, even after the resource which they identify ceases to exist or becomes unavailable"
Why do I care about this for data? Why would I constrain myself? It's bureaucratic nonsense for people to have meetings on. I'm not a library putting angels on a pinhead, real world data is messy.
- dagss 4y agoReposting my response to a similar comment: I don't really want to classify objects. I want to refer to a registration in a registry. Objects can of course be regidtered many places for many reasons but that is not my concern here. As long as I can serialize the tuple (registry-somone-made, id-in-that-registry) in a standard and readable way that would be a huge step forward
- aaron695 4y ago[dead]