> it's such a funny comment because it's pure regurgitation, but the argument in it is against regurgitation being "real thought" If I understand based on my o

> it's such a funny comment because it's pure regurgitation, but the argument in it is against regurgitation being "real thought" If I understand based on my own experience of 'consciousness' that "I" exist, even if everything else I perceive is a simulation or poorly encoded representation of reality, is that understanding 'regurgitation'?