3 ms·
>Basically GNOME is living in and pushing a world where there's only GNOME. No, that's false. I can't see why you'd even think that. GNOME wouldn't be using Wa
by QUrprUd1nCeicw 4y ago
>Basically GNOME is living in and pushing a world where there's only GNOME.
No, that's false. I can't see why you'd even think that. GNOME wouldn't be using Wayland at all if that were true. GNOME uses standards where they make sense, this one optional non-standard part of Wayland just happens to not make any sense for GNOME. They don't have any issue with the rest of Wayland.
- chris_wot 4y agoIt’s not false. Not supporting decorations actively causes problems for non-GNOME software.
- QUrprUd1nCeicw 4y agoNo. How would that even make sense? If you have no GNOME-related software on your computer at all then it won't affect it.