> Taking agricultural workplace participation from 10% to a hypothetical 1% isn't going to drop working hours from 40H to 10H. Yes-- the point is that your arg

> Taking agricultural workplace participation from 10% to a hypothetical 1% isn't going to drop working hours from 40H to 10H. Yes-- the point is that your argument that it requires eating the cheapest synthetic food seems faulty; if 10% of our work hours are going to agriculture and related industries (including, as a sibling points out, restaurants and stores and manufacturing of junk food), then it's not a huge driver of our work week. Similarly, it's not as huge a portion of our labor going to maintain and construct housing as you imply.