3 ms·
Says a lot doesn't it. Marie Jackson makes it into the citations twelve times. Otherwise not mentioned by name. Academia: You thought capitalists were greed
by urthor 4y ago
Says a lot doesn't it.
Marie Jackson makes it into the citations twelve times.
Otherwise not mentioned by name.
Academia:
You thought capitalists were greedy for mere money? Come meet academics.
- next_xibalba 4y agoAgreed. But is this not an example of a fundamental attribution error? The structure and incentives of academia creates all the credit grabbing and back stabbing (IMO). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error
- trynewideas 4y agoThe lead author of this study, Linda M. Seymour, worked with Jackson on reference 29, on the mortar of the Tomb of Caecilia Metella, which is referenced repeatedly and the samples from which form a significant part of the hypothesis. That study: https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.18133 https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jace.18... Story on that study: https://als.lbl.gov/unexpected-transformations-reinforce-roman-architectural-concrete/ https://als.lbl.gov/unexpected-transformations-reinforce-rom... Jackson is quoted, if briefly, by Science's article on the new paper. https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-may-have-found-magic-ingredient-behind-ancient-romes-self-healing-concrete https://www.science.org/content/article/scientists-may-have-... Jackson's work is focused on pyroclastic volcanism. Seymour's work has focused on Roman water infrastructure. Jackson works for the University of Utah, Seymour works for MIT. The linked source is MIT's PR department.
- johnohara 4y agoThank you for pointing this out. A common thread, and no doubt mutual fascination behind Jackson's and Seymour's research, is the use of specific pozzolans found in and around Campi Flegrei volcano west of Naples.
- urthor 4y agoThat's true, I'm not giving any credit at all to the fact the article isn't written by the paper's authors, and is at best a summary.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]