> This isn't about privacy, it is about licensing (and possibly copyright). mhitza mentioned privacy as another policy, that you agree to upon sign-up like the

> This isn't about privacy, it is about licensing (and possibly copyright). mhitza mentioned privacy as another policy, that you agree to upon sign-up like the terms of service, one for which updates are regularly announced. The terms of service say you grant GitHub an implicit license to display your code. They also say: "We may modify this agreement, but we will give you 30 days' notice of material changes." Are you claiming that hasn't happened? > Hasn't it been suggested that all public repositories at least could have been used? It makes sense to give the training pool as much information as possible. Has it? I don't like to make assumptions.