5 ms·
I don't know about SF in particular, but nationwide, yes, renters turn out to vote at a far lower rate than homeowners[0] (67% vs 49%) [0] https://www.apartmen
by akavi 4y ago
I don't know about SF in particular, but nationwide, yes, renters turn out to vote at a far lower rate than homeowners[0] (67% vs 49%)
[0] https://www.apartmentlist.com/research/renter-voting-preferences https://www.apartmentlist.com/research/renter-voting-prefere...
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> nationwide, yes, renters turn out to vote at a far lower rate than homeowners Wider than I expected. Thank you. Asking because in New York, renters turn out, and that drives policy outcomes. (They’re also less likely to think supply and demand is a myth.)
- mrguyorama 4y agoBy and large, poorer people vote less than wealthy people. It is harder to vote in america as a poorer person in many areas, arguably on purpose.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> harder to vote in america as a poorer person in many areas, arguably on purpose Is this true in San Francisco?
- mrguyorama 4y agoUnfortunately at this point, you've reached the end of my knowledge. I assume California has reasonable mail in voting procedures. That should make the "cost" of voting very very minimal. Do we still see poor people voting less there? I don't know actually.