3 ms·
@dang could we get a (2017) added to this? Changes the context quite a bit given FTX folks worked at Jane Street previously and a modern version of this talk wo
by bcjordan 4y ago
@dang could we get a (2017) added to this? Changes the context quite a bit given FTX folks worked at Jane Street previously and a modern version of this talk would have a much different context.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 4y agoFTX's Gary Wang worked at Google. https://www.forbes.com/profile/gary-wang-1/ https://www.forbes.com/profile/gary-wang-1/ It's intriguing how Forbes 400 list includes criminals. If someone tricks people into "investing" with them and they accumulate enough billions of US dollars, and it takes a few years for the authorities to act, then do they get a spot on the Forbes 400. What are the rules.
- ctvo 4y agoI don't think the context changes at all. This talk is about high performing systems (millions of requests per second) written in OCalm. There is nothing here related to the criminality of FTX or what its non-technical founder decided to do with customer funds as a business decision. It matters very little that one or more of them used to work as an analyst at Jane Street.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- gjvc 4y ago> a modern version of this talk would have a much different context How?
- gjvc 4y ago> a modern version of this talk would have a much different context Everything would be in a different context, yes. But how would the content be different?