3 ms·
Note that there are 20 year periods where the net gain is close to 0. People starting their economically productive life during one of those intervals will not
by jgeada 4y ago
Note that there are 20 year periods where the net gain is close to 0. People starting their economically productive life during one of those intervals will not see any economic gains from investing in the stock market, and to the extent that the market echoes the economy their economic situation will likewise be stagnant. And worse, there will be all the people from the lucky intervals extorting these unluckly people to pick themselves up by their bootstraps.
People born in the lucky periods almost always describe their results as due to hard work, never as due to luck. And unlucky timing is almost always attributed to personal failures, not the economic situation.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- throwthere 4y agoBogus. You’re assuming they invested all their dollars at the year 0 (peak) price an and sold everything at the 20 year trough. Of course that’s impossible, they invested over their entire careers which included intervals of much lower prices. So much should be obvious by just looking at the sp500 graph of performance over time. There’s no period where dollar cost averaging over twenty years gave a result like you’re saying.