3 ms·
> i wish there were a browser plugin called "please accept all cookies" There's almost that. It doesn't always accept all cookies but it does hide the warnings
by Zak 4y ago
> i wish there were a browser plugin called "please accept all cookies"
There's almost that. It doesn't always accept all cookies but it does hide the warnings: https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/ https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/
- remram 4y agoCould there be a standard between browsers and websites to avoid those banners? Similar to the Do Not Track header, a Accept Cookies header? Contrary to ad-blocking where the website very much wants you to see ads, and is not going to help you in blocking them, this is a situation where they might be interested to help.
- recursive 4y agoThis is a real problem, but it has gotten quite silly at this point. A user agent can reject cookies by merely not doing anything with them. A user agent can signal that it accepts cookies by just retaining them. You might argue that we could save a pittance in bandwidth by eliding the Set-Cookie header entirely. However, the potential savings here is a drop in the bucket compared to the ocean of javascript to handle the consent banners.
- FrontAid 4y ago> Similar to the Do Not Track header, a Accept Cookies header? Do not track can do that, it has three possible values. 0: The user prefers to allow tracking on the target site. 1: The user prefers not to be tracked on the target site. null: The user has not specified a preference about tracking. Source: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/DNT https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/DN... The problem is that DNT is mostly ignored, and also deprecated by now.
- Zak 4y agoI am not a lawyer or a GDPR expert, but I think that probably wouldn't satisfy the intent of the GDPR any more than current browser capabilities to accept or reject third-party cookies would.