> It can resemble textql, octosql, dsq, duckdb, trdsql, q, datafusion-cli, spyql, but has better capabilities and performance. Higher performance than q? Is th

> It can resemble textql, octosql, dsq, duckdb, trdsql, q, datafusion-cli, spyql, but has better capabilities and performance. Higher performance than q? Is that one of the opensource implementations or q on kdb? If the later, I would be interested in seeing some performance comparisons. Also, congrats on this. It is right up my alley. I like DuckDB for columnar data analytics, but have run into issues dealing with some larger datasets. I am interested in testing this.