3 ms·
I’m glad. If your “art” can be mistaken for AI art, it’s likely just content, not art. The example picture is meaningless, just technical work. Makes no sense u
by xwdv 4y ago
I’m glad. If your “art” can be mistaken for AI art, it’s likely just content, not art. The example picture is meaningless, just technical work. Makes no sense upon scrutiny.
True art is something that can’t be replicated by AI. You will have no doubt once you see it. It still exists even with the proliferation of AI art.
It’s like the difference between a random picture and a meme. The meme looks like a picture, but it captures an emotion or essential human truth that you connect with upon looking at it, where as a picture is just a random picture that could look like a meme but has no real meaning to it. You will know what I’m talking about.
- buffington 4y ago> True art is something that can’t be replicated by AI. You will have no doubt once you see it. Ignoring your assertion about what art is, I have to ask: what happens when you can't tell the difference?
- xwdv 4y agoThen our search for human connection through art only deepens.
- MrNeon 4y agoI looked at the image and it feels like art in the terms that you put it. What now. Is my inner experience of art not valid? How do we reconcile this?