3 ms·
There was a study in the late 2000s that suggested kids (later end of the millennials or younger) tended to prefer the sound of music encrusted with MP3 artifac
by bitwize 4y ago
There was a study in the late 2000s that suggested kids (later end of the millennials or younger) tended to prefer the sound of music encrusted with MP3 artifacts over a straight digital reproduction, which suggested that what you grew up with is what you like to hear and the criteria for a "good sound" are slipperily subjective.
Try running that by a Gen-X music enthusiast, though, and watch them make a Wojak face and cry "NOOOOOO! Digital can't possibly capture the warm guitars and fat synths of my analog-mastered vinyl Zeppelin album! It HAS to be 100% analog from the studio to my earholes!"
- knorker 4y agoThe difference being that depending on the bitrate MP3 artifacts are hearable, whereas digital pure mathematically is not.
- aidenn0 4y agoYou're missing the analogy; it's the artifacts introduced by an AAA[1] mastering process that are audible. 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARS_code https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARS_code