4 ms·

The article is once again mixing up the production of copyrighted work, which is illegal and the training on copyrighted but publicly available work, which afai

The article is once again mixing up the production of copyrighted work, which is illegal and the training on copyrighted but publicly available work, which afaik isn't illegal. And I don't see how it could be illegal when the code is public (although I don't doubt that lawyers will find a way).

layer8 4y ago
The lawsuit is about attributions and licenses, not about copyright infringement.
- poulpy123 4y ago
  It's the same issue. It's only valid if the code produced is the same than the code learned.
  - layer8 4y ago
    I don’t think this is necessarily true for derived works. It’s a gray area in any case, so the outcome will be interesting.