> The end result here is this will only work to fuel more language wars and be used as a cheap weapon in further language debates (...) Quite the contrary. The

> The end result here is this will only work to fuel more language wars and be used as a cheap weapon in further language debates (...) Quite the contrary. The article is as objective and specific as it gets and makes no value judgements but uses well reasoned measurements. The encouraged response to an article like this would not be "language wars" but doing related measurements, perhaps comparing the compilation speeds of idiomatic rewrites of existing tools, discussing the reasons for (slow) compilation speeds, and future improvements thereof.