11 ms·

I'd argue that if the definitions don't overlap, you're not interpreting the word "viable" correctly. EDIT: That came off snarkier than I meant it. What I'm ge

by burke 15y ago

I'd argue that if the definitions don't overlap, you're not interpreting the word "viable" correctly. EDIT: That came off snarkier than I meant it. What I'm getting at is that if you think you have a Minimum Viable Product, but your potential customers don't agree, then the product is actually not viable at all.

skrish 15y ago
:) True. That is why it is essential to continuously engage with potential customers while defining what goes into the product. If we were to work in a closed box environment "assuming" what is required for MVP, we may end up iterating a lot internally. It is essential that what we build is what we validate with customers as "must-haves" for first version.