> An interesting thought is that we really ought to not compare rust with just GCC, but GCC + clang-tidy Nitpick: The article compares Clang, not GCC. (GCC is

> An interesting thought is that we really ought to not compare rust with just GCC, but GCC + clang-tidy Nitpick: The article compares Clang, not GCC. (GCC is mentioned only to show how much faster Clang is.) > you get so much more static analysis by default in rust compilation than C++. I care about the build-test cycle, so adding static analysis is against my goals. I would minimize the analyses done by rustc if I could.