I do get that, but to me it all sums up to “much worse than Google in the best case”. StackOverflow is almost never wrong at the top answer and again has many

I do get that, but to me it all sums up to “much worse than Google in the best case”. StackOverflow is almost never wrong at the top answer and again has many coherent responses for many use cases with contextual help, where GPT is often subtly incorrect with no real context (precision struggles). The whole iterative thing is maybe good for learning tools. Just not seeing a revolution, yet. The struggles for SEO are less than those for GPT, both have to deal with spam and weird data, but GPT you’re also out of date, don’t have much explainability, and basically trust one giant black box of bias that requires higher input-foo whereas Google is also a giant black box of bias but at least you land at SO or Reddit or something where things are concrete and easy to understand. Again, if this was some iPhone level revolution I’d have no comparable. It’d be way better at something clearly. But it’s not even clearly equal to any of the examples, and imo worse than basically all except “draw me a dragon in a tutu”, caricature artists should be worried! On second thought, caricature artists are pretty safe since much of that experience is the whole human drawing you thing and also the generative models don’t really do caricature well as of now.