3 ms·
An interesting thought is that we really ought to not compare rust with just GCC, but GCC + clang-tidy, since you get so much more static analysis by default in
by fouronnes3 4y ago
An interesting thought is that we really ought to not compare rust with just GCC, but GCC + clang-tidy, since you get so much more static analysis by default in rust compilation than C++.
- strager 4y ago> An interesting thought is that we really ought to not compare rust with just GCC, but GCC + clang-tidy Nitpick: The article compares Clang, not GCC. (GCC is mentioned only to show how much faster Clang is.) > you get so much more static analysis by default in rust compilation than C++. I care about the build-test cycle, so adding static analysis is against my goals. I would minimize the analyses done by rustc if I could.