4 ms·
Why wouldn't one download something like that in 720P video/196kbps audio? I mean, there's a time and a place for 4K, but watching the zits on the face of a gu
by romwell 4y ago
Why wouldn't one download something like that in 720P video/196kbps audio?
I mean, there's a time and a place for 4K, but watching the zits on the face of a guy who tells you how to play C Am F G on a guitar isn't it.
Not to mention, most of those cheap 4K cameras won't have optics to utilize those pixels; no quality will be lost in 720p.
- kristianp 4y agoThat depends, if the source is bright enough, those little pixels will have enough signal to work effectively.
- 0cf8612b2e1e 4y agoMy downloader defaults to the highest quality, so unless I remember to specify a setting, I get gigabytes of video for something that could easily be 480 quality. In the event I forget, I reencode with ffmpeg.
- romwell 4y agoIt's a reasonable default, but if one has gone to the trouble of setting up a NAS and scripts, might as well tick that box.