A similar campaign can be held for any word, personality, or cause. This is more like a political campaign than any form of manipulation. Google shouldn't be

A similar campaign can be held for any word, personality, or cause. This is more like a political campaign than any form of manipulation. Google shouldn't be in the business of picking and choosing which popular movements should be "penalized" and which shouldn't. Now if content farms, SEO or other forms of manipulation are involved then I agree 100% with you. But I don't like the idea of a corporation suppressing a popular cause, which is really what this is. Is there evidence of a real SEO type manipulation going on here? If so, your point would be a lot stronger if you provided some links (I am going on the principle that the accuser should provide the evidence which is why I haven't provided evidence of the nonexistence of manipulation). I would sincerely like to know if there is evidence of widespread manipulation of search results here.