3 ms·
My understanding is that you think I've offered you a rebuttal with new information to anything you might challenge me with. I haven't. I originally offered a m
by marmetio 4y ago
My understanding is that you think I've offered you a rebuttal with new information to anything you might challenge me with. I haven't. I originally offered a meta-comment about the way that people discuss the topic, in response to another meta-comment about the same.
You understood what I said in a very different way than I meant it. I recognized that early on and told you so repeatedly. You willfully ignored me, and apparently continue to do so.
What can I do to clarify myself? You haven't asked me for clarification. You misconstrue everything I offer up because you view it through the lense of the initial misunderstanding. You ignore me when I explicitly tell you we need clarification. I'm out of ideas. What am I supposed to do?
- Schroedingersat 4y agoYou've only repeated the assertion that anyone who has any objection to nuclear is irrational and refused to substantiate it. And this in response to my comment specifically outlining why even technically uneducated objections to the industry are actually wholly rational and evidence based, just not on evidence you like. You then followed your initial insult with further insults, and repeatedly attempted to deflect from my main point which was a rebuttal to yours by claiming I didn't understand it.
- marmetio 4y ago> You've only repeated the assertion that anyone who has any objection to nuclear is irrational I already explained I never said that, much less repeated it. Clearly I'm not really a participant in this conversation. If you want to continue this conversation with yourself, go ask ChatGPT to debate you or something.