> Suppose you had a guy whose only job was to flip through millions of photos until he found someone he thought looked like the photo of the suspect. Would you

> Suppose you had a guy whose only job was to flip through millions of photos until he found someone he thought looked like the photo of the suspect. Would you accept his word as sufficient evidence to arrest someone? I certainly wouldn't, and changing the man flipping through pictures to an AI shouldn't change that. Do we even have a way to discern why AI choose this particular picture? Are we sure it didn't happen because both pictures were mugshots or cat in the background upped the score?