3 ms·
First, please, don't get me wrong because I am absolutely against his anti-gay policies myself. From what I've read, the site which has given Santorum a meanin
by Zirro 15y ago
First, please, don't get me wrong because I am absolutely against his anti-gay policies myself.
From what I've read, the site which has given Santorum a meaning have made the demand that he stops talking negatively about homosexuals. If he does, the site will go away. This makes me think, even though I somehow think he deserves it: Isn't this essentially against free speech? Forcing someone to censor their opinions through non-violent troublemaking?
I probably didn't manage to phrase that well-enough to please anyone, but at least I've voiced my concerns.
- omaranto 15y agoI wouldn't call it "forcing" Santorum to censor his opinions, as far as I know he hasn't done so.
- meepmorp 15y agoThis isn't forcing Santorum to censor his opinions, nor is it even an attempt to do so. It's counter free speech. He's free to say what he pleases, and a lot of people are free to call him a frothy anal sex byproduct. This is exactly how the freedom of speech is meant to work.